Popular Posts

Saturday, March 23, 2013

LPG and Indian Administrative System


LPG and Indian Administrative System
Under the forces of globalization-liberalization recent decades have seen a shift towards reduced role for the state and government in all countries. India could have not remained unaffected by these global trends. The nineties saw the replacement of ‘License, Quota, Permit (LPG) Raj’ by Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization (LPG) regime.

One natural and inevitable consequence of planned development in India has been the phenomenal growth and extension of public undertakings in varies fields of developmental activities. There was contextual change from Imperial governance to Democratic governance and from Night watchman state to the Welfare state. State assumed varied responsibilities to respond to increased expectations of people from independent state and our owned government and to achieve goals of socio-economic justice along with political democracy.

The Public enterprises were assigned a pre-eminent role in the economic development. The scheme of Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956, talks of ‘commanding heights of the economy’ through public sector enterprises. The economic development and rate of growth were accelerated and sound economic infrastructure for industrialization was established. The monopolies and concentration of wealth in the hands of few could not be prevented but self-reliance in strategic fields to reduce dependence on foreign technology was attained. Balance regional development was achieved and regional disparities were reduced. Employment opportunities in different sectors improved standard of living of people and reduced the pressure on balance of payment through export promotion and import reduction.

Notwithstanding these achievements, the public enterprises have met with enormous failures, especially in financial performance and managerial efficiency. Of the total 240 central enterprises, about 140 were making profits and 100 were incurring losses in 1990. Due to their inefficiency desired results were not achieved.

Impact of LPG:
To improve the overall performance of the Indian Economy, the Central Government announced in 1991 the New Economic Policy. It came to be known as the ‘New Economic Policy’ as it made a ‘radical’ departure from Nehruvian Economic Philosophy contained in the 1956 policy. In essence, it heralded the era of liberalization which led to privatization and globalization.

Liberalization means free-market economy. It marks a change from a restrictionist regime to a free regime. It implies reducing, relaxing and dismantling of government’s controls and regulation in economic activities.
These measures include: delicensing of a good number of industries, raising of licensing limits, relaxations under the MRTP Act, broad banding, relaxations under the FERA (FEMA) regulations, legislation of additional capacities, relaxations in export-import policy and so forth.
Thus the private sector is permitted to function freely in respect of investment, production and products.

Privatization means- 1. Denationalization, i.e. changing the ownership of public enterprises fully or partially to the private parties, 2. Deregulation i.e. allowing the entry of private sector into areas hitherto exclusively reserved for the public sector and 3. Operating contract, i.e. entrusting the management and control of public enterprises to the private parties on agreed remuneration.

Globalisation means progressive integration of Economies throughout the world and treating the whole world as one global market by removing the restrictions on foreign trade. This implies opening up the Indian economy to foreign direct investment. It removes constraints to the entry of Multi National Companies (MNC’s) in India. Thus, Indian Economy is made part and parcel of the world economy.

The various reasons for this change in the Governments policy towards public sector are as follows:
·         The dismal financial performance of the public sector.
·         Low returns against heavy investments in Public enterprises.
·         Government’s inability to provide budgetary support to sick enterprises.
·         The need to create competition for the public enterprises so that they are forced to earn profits through improved efficiency.
·         The global trend towards liberalization, privatization and gobalisation invited the private sector to come forward to invest in infrastructure areas.
·         External factors influencing the government like advanced countries, MNC’s, World Bank, IMF and so on.

The New Industrial Policy of 1991 contained the following provisions with regard to the public sector:
·         The Government decided to confine public sector investments to strategic, hi-tech and essential infrastructure areas.
·         Some of the areas reserved public sectors will be opened up to the private sector selectively and public sector was allowed to enter in areas not reserved for it.
·         Chronically sick public enterprises will be referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) for formulation of revival and rehabilitation schemes. Etc…

DEMOCRACY


Democracy

            The English word ‘democracy’ is derived from two Greek words ‘demos’ meaning the people, and ‘cratia’ meaning power, that is power or government of the people. Abraham Lincoln has defined democracy as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Democracy has assumed two terms:
            Direct democracy or pure democracy, and indirect or representative democracy.
I) Direct democracy:
            Under direct democracy the people run the government directly and not through their elected representatives. All the people assemble at a particular place to make laws, sanction laws, decide policies and appoint public officials. Such type of democracy cannot be practice in modern nation-states due to their large territory and ever-increasing population and introduction of universal adult-franchise.
II) Indirect democracy:
In an indirect, a representative democracy, the people govern the country, not directly but indirectly, that is through their periodically elected representatives. Such democracy can be possible in modern times.

Fundamental Principles of modern democracy
1) Everyone has a share in the Government
            In democratic government every one has a share in the government.

2) Rule by the majority of votes.
            A democratic government is a rule by the majority of votes. But at the same time minority, through the democratic means influence the decision making and even after every election it can transform into a majority.

3) Genuine Consent of the Governed (Public)
            Democracy is the government, based on the principle of the genuine consent of the governed. The consent of the governed must be real, active, and effective. The consent, once given to the government to govern, can be withdrawn, at any time, in a parliamentary democracy and in such circumstances the Government. is obliged to resign.

 4) Government by public opinion-
            A democratic government is based on the principle of an alert and enlightened public opinion, which influences, moulds and shapes the policies, programmes, and actions of the government of the day.

5) Government of discussions and criticism.
            Democratic governments function on the principle that every citizen has the fundamental right to pass judgment freely, fearlessly and frequently on the work of Governors, hence the right to freedom of speech, expression, press, and association are guaranteed to all citizens. These rights are integral to democracy.

6) All are equal in the eyes of the law:
Democracy is based on the principle of equality of all citizens, irrespective of caste, colour, creed sex, place of birth, education, religion, etc. It therefore, guarantees equality of opportunity to all citizens in matters of public employment and public offices.

7) Protection of rights of Minorities and weaker sections of society.
            Protecting and promoting the rights and interests of the religious and linguistic minority communities and those of the other weaker sections of the society is inherent in the democracy.

8) Recognition of the dignity of the human personality
            Democracy recognizes the dignity of the human personality and all that goes with it.

Absence of militarism:
            Militarism favours heavy concentration of authority and the rise of absolutism. This is not favourable to the habits of thought; it perverts education into training in artificial habits of command and obedience rather than those of internal discipline and quality of co-operation.
Democratic traditions.
            England has centuries old democratic traditions. These traditions are one of the reasons for the success of democracy in England.
Agreement on Some basic Axioms.
            The main pillar of democracy is “a mental habit of agreement upon a number of axioms”. These are as under: a
a) Agreement to Differ:

            It implies agreement on fundamental problems, which the political community faces and difference on the choice of policy to be adapted to those problems.
b) Majority Principle:
            This principle implies that the majority and the minority should enter into a meaningful dialogue in a spirit of “give and take” which will result in the inclusion of some of the ideas of the minority in the majority decision which will thus acquire a new quality.
c) Principle of Compromise:
            The process discussion demands a frame of mind characterized by the climate of mutual tolerance, and respect for each other’s points of view.

Challenges to Democracy
1)      Growing Role of Communalism and Religious fundamentalism.
            One of the most potent dangers to democracy, especially in our country, is the growing role of communalism and religious fundamentalism.
            Communalism in form of inter-communal riots, destruction and forcible occupation of religious places, misuse of religious places by fundamentalists and militarists is found in our country.

2)      Terrorism and Militarism:
            These are another serious challenge to democracy. Advance Arms have made terrorists activities easier and smoother
            Terrorism in Punjab, in Assam under Mizoram National front (MNF), Naga National Council (NNC), ULFA (United Liberation front of Assam), National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN), and Terrorist Activities in Kashmir Valley by the Pro-Pakistan Kashmir is as well as of LTTE in southern states are serious challenges to the Indian democracy.

3)      Casteism
            Since independence, caste has been playing an increasingly important role in all political, activities including elections, political appointments, party formations, etc. These ‘castes’ have been using political opportunities to gain and retain political power in the name of the jatis by full exploitation of caste consciousness for narrow political gains.
            To casteist, citizens are of consequences only as members of a jati, and caste is an electoral constituency, whose promotion and protection of interests become his basic and only concern. Casteism, thus cuts society into caste groups and weakens national unity.
4)      All round corruption at all levels and insufficient administration
            Another major challenge to democracy in India and abroad comes from an all round corruption, at all levels, accompanied by an inefficient politics, and lethargic administration. Criminalization of politics, politicization of crime, and an all-round corruption-all are closely connected and interwoven, and manifest in different forms, attacking democratic system from all fronts.

5)      Criminalization of politics and Breakdown of law and order machinery.
            Many persons with criminal records get elected to the state legislative assemblies by anti-democratic means. Representative democracy is possible only if free, fair and impartial, periodic elections are held on the basis of universal adult suffrage. However, the role of money power and muscle power in (i) intimidations of voters, kidnapping of candidates, (ii) free supply of liquor and other inducements, (iii) murders of active workers and (iv) ballot-box jugglery makes free and fair  elections nearly impossible.
            The frequent breakdown of law and order machinery has caused frequent military intervention, for maintenance of civil order, which suggests as well as contributes to the breakdown of legitimate constitutional govt, which is one of the pillars of democracy.

6)      Widespread Socio-Economic Distress:
            The socio-economic distress, manifested in a variety of ways, such as glaring economic inequalities between the few rich and the multitude of poor, mass poverty, illiteracy, conditions of famine, and unemployment pose a serious challenge.
            A vote of a starving and illiterate can be easily nullified by his poverty, as votes can be purchased and sold at the time of elections. In another way failure of the govt. to take effective and corrective measures for removal of socio economic distress, may invite the year and anger of the unfortunate masses in the form of revolt, which has the effect of demolishing the democratic structure in the country.

Lokpal


Lokpal:
            The Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) headed by Morarji Desai submitted a special interim report on ‘Problems of Redressal of Citizen’s Grievances’ in 1966. In this report the ARC recommended the setting up of two special authorities designated as ‘Lokpal’ and ‘Lokayukta’ for the redressal of citizen’s grievances.
            These institutions were to be set up on the pattern of the institution of Ombudsman in Scandinavian countries and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Investigation in New Zealand.
            The Lokpal would deal with complaints against ministers and secretaries at Central and state levels, and the Lokayukta (one at the centre and one in every state) would deal with complaints against other specified higher officials.
            The Government of India accepted the recommendations of ARC. So far, nine official attempts have been made to bring about legislation on this subject. However, none of the bills were passed by the Parliament due to one or other reasons. In 2011-12, owing to the public pressure and pressing demands by Anna Hajare and his Jan Lokpal Movement the Government again started rethinking on this issue and introduced a Lokpal Bill in the Loksabha in 2012. It was passed in the
Loksabha but Government failed clear it in the Rajya Sabha.
            The purpose of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011, is to provide for the establishment of a body called the Lokpal for the Centre and bodies called the Lokayukta for States to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries.
            The Lokpal has the power to conduct a preliminary inquiry, investigate and prosecute any offence brought to its notice through an appropriately filed complaint. No special sanction is required to initiate the investigation and prosecution.
            The Lokpal has the power to summon and examine any person as it deems necessary and even attach any property or material it believes are “proceeds of offense”. It may also recommend disciplinary action if the inquiry/investigation concludes that an offense was committed.

Naxalism in India:


+Naxalism in India:
            The Maoist movement, also called the Naxalite movement, after Naxalbari the name of a rural town where a 1967 peasant uprising ignited this tendency within the Indian Communist movement, has the New Democratic Revolution as its declared objective, the overthrow of the ‘‘semi-feudal, semi-colonial’’ state through protracted people’s war. Because of this, it has always faced severe state repression. (Giri 2009)
            The Naxalite movements are a serious threat for the Indian State: They are now active in 223 districts in 20 states and the strength of their armed cadres is estimated between 10.000 and 20.000. Due to the Naxalite’s control over certain areas and their armed fight against the state security forces, they are challenging the inherent ideals of the state, namely sovereignty and monopoly on the use of force. In order to correspond with its ideal, the state focuses on the re-establishment of law and order by encountering the Naxalites violently.
            However, the movement’s roots are located within India’s numerous social and economic inequalities as well as in environmental degradation. Without fostering the root causes the state will not be able to solve the problem.
Region affected
            Initially the movement had its centre in the West Bengal. In later years, it spread into less developed areas of rural central and eastern India, such as Chattisgarh, Orrisa, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra.
            The naxals enjoy immense support among the lower strata of the society in what is known as the Red corridor, a collection of states (names mentioned above) with active Naxalism. Two phases of Struggle:
·         The original struggle was against feudal landlords and landownership
·         The new struggle is against state domination, modernization and development which parallels the rise of India as a strong economy propelled by capitalism and liberal economic gains.
·         The issue of identity politics is a strong driver of the conflict
Framing the Problem:
            This security-centric understanding of the Maoist ‘‘problem,’’ is challenged by sections of the dissident left who see it as a socio-economic problem, arising from deprivation, loss of livelihood, lack of employment opportunities and abject poverty, given a neo-liberal state abdicating all welfare functions
Human Toll:
            According to the BBC, more than 6,000 people have died during the rebels' 20-year fight between 1990 and 2010.
            More than 11,700 people have been killed since the start of the insurgency in 1980, of which more than half died in the last ten years.
            According to the Institute of Peace and Conflict studies, Naxal groups have recruited children in different capacities and exposed them to injury and death. However the same accusation has been levelled at the state-sponsored Salwa Judum anti-Maoist group, and Special Police officers (SPOs) assisting the government security forces.[
Tackling Naxalism:
            The Government has formulated a two pronged strategy to solve the problem of Naxalism.
1.      Modernizing the Police Force 
            The government has launched a Police Modernization Scheme in areas affected by Naxal movements. Under this scheme huge sums of money have been provided to the state governments by the central government to modernize their equipment and tactical gear including latest communication, vehicles and infrastructure facility.
2.      Social Economic Development 
            The government started the Backward Districts initiative in 2003-2004 and the Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) under which 55 of the worst affected areas in 9 states were to be provided with funds to the tune of Rs. 2475 crores to tackle the problem of Naxalism. Around 250 districts have been included the BRGF scheme to accelerate socio-economic development in these districts which is to be administered by the Ministry of Panchayati Raj.
Conclusion:
            The state has to do much more than plan counter-insurgency operations or support violent vigilante groups to suppress the Naxalite movement. After close examination of the historical and ideological origins of the movement, it is clear that the movement thrives on the dissatisfaction of the marginalized and alienates the population. The socio-economic perspective of Naxalism talks about how the rebel movement is shaped due to the failure of the institutional mechanisms and frameworks to deliver socio-economic justice. 

(Ref: http://www.idsa.in/jds/4_2_2010_NaxaliteMovementinIndia_rdixit)

Election Commission:


Election Commission:
            A good electoral system is, therefore, the bed rock of genuine representative government. The architects of the Indian constitution attached the highest significance to arzon-dependent electoral machinery for the conduct of elections.
            For this it was necessary that an independent election commission with its vast paraphernalia should be set-up in country such a commission could ensure fair and free elections of the representatives of the pie at all levels.
            Articles 324, Dr. Ambedkar contended, "proposed centralise the election machinery in hands of a single commission, be assisted by regional commissioners working under the supervision direction control of the election commission and not and under e control of the state government as envisaged earlier."

Composition of the Election Commission:
            Of the four pillars of the Indian constitution, the Election commission is one, the other three being the Supreme Court, the public service commission and the comptroller and Auditor General of India.
            On the Election commission depends the integrity of election, which truly is the oxygen of democracy. Thus viewed, its independence d impartiality assume critical importance to the country's entire political system.
            To ensure free and fair and impartial elections, the constitution establishes the Election Commission, a body autonomous in character and free from political orenecutive influence. The commission is an All India body having jurisdiction over, elections to parliament, fate Legislatures, offices of the president and vice-president.
            The Election Commission consists of the Chief Election Commissioner, and such number of Election Commissioners if any as the president may fix from time to time.
            The Chief Election Commissioner stands at the apex of the hierarchy of the Election Commission of India. All these commissioners are appointed by the president subject to the provisions of any law enacted by parliament for the purpose.
            The Chief Election Commissioner acts as the chairman of the Election Commission in case any other Election Commissioner besides him is appointed.
            The tenure of the Chief Election Commissioner is independent of the executive discretion, for he cannot be removed from his of face except in the like manner and on the like grounds as a judge of the Supreme Court. The conditions of service of the Chief Election Commissioner cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
            The president also promulgated an ordinance amending the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioner Act providing for unanimous transaction of business and decisions but in case of differences of opinion among the three members the matter shall be decided "according to the opinion of the majority."
            The Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioner Act, 1991 as existed before the issue of ordinance was weighed in favour of the chief election commissioner on decision making in case of differences among the members of the commission.
            The constitution provides for a single member or multi­member Election Commission. Where there is more than one I members the CEC acts as its chairman.
            The committee on Electoral Reforms has made certain recommendations with regard to the items and conditions of service Of the Chief Election Commissioner and the other Election Commissioners. After having studied those recommendations the chief Election Commissioners of India conditions of service rules 1972 were amended with introspective, effect from 1st January 1986.
            The Chief Election Commissioner of India will not be entitled to the salary and other facilities, like rent free accommodation, equivalery to that of a judge of Supreme Court. The term of his office has also been extended upto 6 years, from the date he assumes office or till the day he at his the age of 65 years.
            To assist the Chief Election Commissioner in the performance of his onerous duties there exists large paraphernalia of the officers and the staff subordinate to him. Among them is the regional commissioner. Deputy Election Commissioner, secretary, Under secretary, Research officers etc.
            In the place of the regional commissioners a new post of Deputy Election Commissioner was created in the Election Commission for the first time in 1956. Since he Deputy Chief Election Commissioner is appointed by the president and is usually sent on deputation, he can be recalled by the central govt, at the request of the chief Election Commissioner at any time.
            At the state or the union territory level there is the Chief Election officer as the kingpin in the Electoral machinery. He is nominated by the Election Commission in consultation with the state Govt. He is usually a senior executive or judicial officer of the state Government.

            He is assisted by the joint deputy or assistant Chief Election officers as well as the rest of the staff appointed by him in consultation with the state government. He may be a whole time or part time officer.
            At the district level the electoral duties are discharged by the District officer or the Executive Officer in addition to his normal administrative routine.
            The responsibility for the preparation and revision of electoral rolls is rested in an officer called the Electoral Registration officer. He may have under him Assistant Electoral Registration officers.
            The election in every constituency is supervised by an officer known as the returning officer nominated by the Election commission in consultation with the govt, of the state.
            The same officer can be nominated as returning officer r more than one constituencies. He is assisted by one or more assistant Returning Officers so designated by the Election Commission.
            The staff consisting of presiding and polling officers, for the actual conduct of the poll is appointed by the District Election officer.
            The District Election Officer may appoint a presiding officer for each polling station and such polling officers are necessary. The presiding officer keeps order of the pooling station and ensures the fair conduct of the poll.

Functions and powers of the Election Commission:
            The Election Commission of India has to perform multifarious duties assigned to it under the constitution. Some of the principal functions of the commission are:
(1) Demarcation of constituencies:
            To facilitate the process of elections a country has to be divided into several constituencies. The task of delimiting constituencies is generally performed by a delimitation commission. But the power to delimit parliamentary and assembly constituencies for the first general elections in 1951 was conferred on the president.
            The Election Commission distributed the seats district wise in each one of the states and directed the Chief Electoral Officers to prepare proposals for the physical demarcation of constituencies according to the prescribed criteria.
            The procedure adopted in the delimitation of constituencies in 1951 led to a virtual power in the hands of the ruling party to decide the contours of the constituencies as it suited its designs.

            The association of parliamentary Advisory committees with the delimitation commission gave top priority to political consideration. The Election Commission strongly pleaded for taking away this power from the parliament.
            The Delimitation commission was to consist of three members, two of whom were to be nominated by the president from serving or retired judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts while the Chief Election Commissioner was to be an ex-officio member.

(2) Electoral Rolls:
            The second important but tedious function of the Election Commission is to prepare for identification the upto date list of all the persons who are entitled for voting at the poll.

(3) Recognition of political parties and Allotment of Symbols:
            A new part IV A has been added to the representation of the people Amendment Act, 1951 on registration of political parties.
            Section 29 A now inserted provides for registration with the commission, of associations and bodies of individual citizens of India as political parties for purpose of this Act. This provision came into force from June 15, 1989. A recognised political party has been classified either as a National Party or a state party under paragraph 7 of the Elections symbol order 1968.
            Another important function of the Election Commissioner is to allot symbols to the political parties and the candidates, and also to accord recognition to the political parties. The commission has specified certain symbols as reserved and others as free.
            The reserved symbols are only available for candidates sponsored by the political parties and the free symbols are equally available to other candidates.
            The Election Commission has power to adjudicate upon disputes with regard to recognition of political parties and rival claims to a particular symbol for the purposes of elections.

(4) Scrutiny of the Nomination Papers:
            Another function of the Election Commission is to examine the nomination papers of the candidates. These papers are accepted if found in order, but rejected otherwise. This duty is performed by the returning officer who notifies to all the contesting candidates the date, time and place for the formal scrutiny of nomination papers.

            The Returning officer summarily but judicially examines all the nomination papers and decides the objection raised. He is also to see whether the requisite requirements of security deposit, election symbol, election agent etc. have also been fulfilled.
            He is empowered to reject the nomination papers either by upholding the objection raised by a rival candidate or on his own motion or any of the following (a) that the candidate either is not qualified or is disqualified to fill the seat under any of the relevant constitutional provisions viz. Articles 84. 102, 173 and 191 (b) that the provision of sections 33 and 34 of the representation of the people's Act 1951 have not been complied with and (c) that the signature of the candidate or the proposer on the nomination or papers is not genuine.

(5) The conduct of the poll:
            Another stupendous task that the Election Commission has to undertake is the conduct of the poll throughout the whole of India. In a parliamentary constituency, the returning officer is to make suitable arrangements for conducting the poll with the prior approval of the Election Commission.
            The commission can order a Ripoll for the whole constituency under compulsion of circumstances. Articles 324 confers on the Election Commission necessary powers to conduct the elections including the power to countermand the poll in a constituency and ordering a fresh poll there in because of hooliganism and break down of law and order at the line of polling or counting of votes.

(6) Election Expenses:
            Another most controversial function that the election commission has perform is no scrutinize the accounts of election expenses submitted by contestants in elections. In India every contesting candidate is required to maintain and file the accounts of his election expenses.
            Within a prescribed period after publication of the result of his election within 10 days from the last date of filing the returns the Returning Officer submits to the Election Commission a list of all the candidates and their agents together with their returns as also his observation in respect of candidates who have failed to lodge returns in the specified time and a accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
            The commission scrutinizes the accounts and dudes whether the returns are in proper form and whether they have been lodged in time. In case of default it notifies the candidates or their agents of there disqualification by publishing these in the official Gazette.

Role of the Election Commission:
            Election is the contrivance through which a modern state creates amongst its citizens a sense of involvement and participation in public affairs. It is through popular elections that the authority of a government, is clouted with legitimacy and peaceful and orderly transfer of authority to new leaders is ensured.
            For this it was necessary than an independent Election Commission with its vast paraphernalia should be set up in the country. Such a commission would ensure fair and free election of the representatives of the people at all levels.
            According to L.K. Advani, "The Election Commission occupies a pivotal place in the scheme of the Indian constitution. During recent years it has willingly or unwillingly abdicated its independent Supra governmental authority and accepted for itself the role of a mere official department charged with the conduct of elections."
            The relations between CES and the central and state Governments are not cordial. The confrontation and the ensuing embarrassment for the Governments as a result of the ruling given by Chief Election Commissioner J.N. Seshan have only been increasing.
            With a critical evaluation of the working of the Election Commission of India so far as we can now infer that: Firstly, the working of the Elections Commission of India during the last four decades has shown that the Election Commission worked independently and impartially, as well as efficiently.
            Secondly, the Election Commission has fulfilled all the constitutional obligations, and has never tried to go beyond or over step the limits of the constitution. It always worked within the frame work of the constitution.
            Thirdly, when the Election Commission conducted the first General Election in 1951-52 the electorates were just 17 million but the present strength of the electorate is about 50 crores. The commission has however been able to cope with its ever mounting responsibilities. It has the capacity to meet new challenges and faced the situation boldly.
            Fourthly, although the faith of the people in democracy, its institutions and political parties has eroded but their faith in the Election Commission has all the more strengthened or fortified.
            According to the Election Commission, the very fact that in almost all states the rulling parties have suffer setbacks shows that the elections have been free and fair.
            It has given the lie to the wide spread belief that the party in power will use official machinery and influence the voters in its favour.