Popular Posts

Friday, January 20, 2012

Issues in International Politics(TYBA- PAPER VI):Human Rights

Human Rights:
Major Landmarks
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  • Two International Conventions
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child
  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
    Women
Three Generation of Human rights: As defined by Karel Vasak
a)      Civil and Political rights
b)      Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
c)      Group rights or solidarity- such as right to development, right to environment.


Q. 1.    Discuss the achievements of the covenants regarded as the landmarks in the evolution of Human Rights.           

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS:

On December 10, 1948, the U.N. General Assembly adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The Assembly appealed to all member countries to take institutional efforts to educate and communicate their people the text of U.D.H.R. without distinction and any consideration.

The provisions of U.D.H.R. are in the forms of Rights, Duties and Limitations. They can be classified into four categories.

1        Human Rights of All Persons
Article 1 & 2 of the UDHR confirms  freedom and equality of all human beings with respect to dignity and rights without distinction of any kind such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political and other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status even political, jurisdictional or international status of the country. While declaring its faith in the reason and conscience of the human beings it expects the spirit of brotherhood from all.

2        Civil and Political Rights 
From Article 3 to Article 21 it guarantees Right to life, liberty and security of person, Freedom from slavery, from torture, Right to recognition everywhere as person before law, Equal protection of law, Effective remedy for violation of FRTs., Protection from arbitrary arrest., Fair trial and public hearing by independent and impartial tribunal, The presumption of innocence until proved guilty,  No arbitrary interference with privacy, Freedom of movement, residence, Right to leave his country or return back, Rt. to nationality, no one can be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality. to marry and form a family, to own property alone as well as in association with others, to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, of opinion and expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, to participate in the govt. and equal access to public service.

3        Economic, social and cultural rights.
From Article 22 to Article 27 it guarantees, Right to social security, to work, equal pay for equal work, to rest and leisure, limited working hours, with pay holidays, Adequate standard of living, Right to education, to freely participate in the cultural life, protection of moral and material interest.

4        Duties and Limitations
Apart from the list of rights the UDHR in it article 28 to 30 also have provisions regarding duties and limitations of persons as well as states regarding the enjoyment of the rights guaranteed in the UDHR. These are, everyone is entitled to social and economic order in which Rights and freedoms are realized, Rights will be limited by law in the interest of the protection of others rights. And duty of state not to act in a manner which may lead to the destruction of rights.
These provisions are not legally enforceable rights and not legally binding on the member states. Despite of this limitation they are used as a standard of conduct and as a basis for appeals in urging governments to take measures to observe Human Rights. Numbers of global and regional treaties has been prepared that transform universal declaration into international conventional law. Further the domestic law of many states has shown the marked influence of the UDHR.
The limitation that UDHR operated as a statement of ideals, which was not of the nature of a legally binding covenant and had no machinery for its enforcement, was sought to be removed by the UN General Assembly by adopting in December, 1966, two covenants for the purpose of observance of human rights-

(A)                                     The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
(B)                                      The Covenant on Economics, Social and Cultural Rights.

The two covenants came into force in December, 1976. Those covenants are legally binding on the ratifying states who are obliged to adopt legislative measures to implement the covenant to ensure the rights proclaimed in the covenant so that, though the covenant itself is not part of the domestic law of the ratifying State, the rights embodied in the relevant legislation are enforceable through the domestic courts.

Enforcement procedures: These covenants contain more detail versions of the rights articulated in UDHR.  The chief interest in the covenants contains enforcement procedures to ensure that states ratifying them fulfill their obligation in good faith. Due to these covenants UDHR has become binding on all the states.  In addition each covenant contains a reporting procedure i.e. member states must give periodical report of the measures they have adopted to enforce it and the progress made in the enjoyment of those rights.

Provision for interstate complaints: Civil and Political covenant also provides for interstate complaints procedure i.e. the state can make complaints against another state (both should be party to the covenant) regarding the failure in fulfilling the obligations.  The complaint is made to the Human Rights Committee under the covenant.  However both the states should recognize the competence of the committee to here the complaints.

Optional protocol of the civil and political covenant. - It contains an informal complaint procedure whereby an individual may complaint to the Human Rights committee that a state party to the optional protocol has violated the rights guaranteed to him under the covenant.   The covenant on eco, social, and cultural rights was adopted on 3rd Jan, 1976 and the covenant on civil and political rights was adopted on 23rd March, 1976.  Both the covenants are ratified by more than 130 members.

(A)             INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS (ICCPR):

The ICCPR runs in to 53 Articles. It can be classified into four categories.
1              Civil Human Rights
All the civil human rights are recognized and guaranteed to all persons, citizens as well as aliens alike. Some of the important civil human rights are, Right to Life, Right Against ‘Torture, or Inhuman Treatment, Slavery’, Right to ‘Liberty and Security of Person, Human Dignity, freedom of Movement and Residence, Fair and Public Trial,  Recognition as a Person Before Law, Privacy, Family, Correspondence and Reputation, Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Speech and Expression, Association, Marry and Found a Family, Protection of a Child, Peaceful Assembly, Equality Before the Law, Minorities, Enjoy Natural Wealth and Resources’, Rights of the Arrested Person and Restrictions on the Enjoyment of Civil Rights.

2              Political Human Rights
All the political human rights recognized and guaranteed to almost all citizens of a state. They are, Right to Self-Determination, Take Part in the Government, and an Equal Access to Public Services.
3              Obligations (Duties) of states
Apart from the above said provisions regarding protection of Civil and Political Rights of the people ICCPR also provided for the duties of the State to Guarantee and Respect the Rights of Individuals without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. It fixes responsibility of each state to adopt such legislative or other measures, as may be necessary, to give effect to the rights, recognized in the ICCPR. It further lays down that it shall be the responsibility of each state to ensure that any person, whose rights and freedoms are violated, shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons, acting in an official capacity. It shall also be the responsibility of each state to ensure that the competent authorities (Supreme Court and High Courts) shall enforce such remedies, when granted. It imposes on state, Duty to Ensure Equal Right of Men and Women and Duty on every state, group, or person, not to engage in any activity, or perform any act, aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms, recognized by the ICCPR.

4              Establishment of Human Rights committee.
Article 28 to 45 of the ICCPR deal with the establishment of a Human Rights Committee, its composition, election of its members by secret ballot by State Parties to the present Covenant, its tenure, vacancy of membership and its filling by election, emoluments of members, provision for its necessary staff and facilities, its meetings, election of its officers, submission of its reports, appointment of ad hoc Conciliation Commission and their privileges, facilities and immunities.

CONVENTION ON ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN (1979)

Although the international community proclaimed the UDHR in 1948and subsequent ratification of the ICCPR and ICESCR in 1966 it was criticized to have failed to overcome ‘gender bias’ and to provide ‘gender equality’ to the women. Especially in third world counties where patriarchal structure of society give preference to male in all walks of life. Women face discrimination through, infanticide, malnutrition, ill health care, and domestic violence against women including sexual abuse and sexual harassment. A change in the traditional role of men as well as the role of women in society and in the family is needed to achieve full equality between men and women. All this led to the adoption of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) by the UN General Assembly on December 18, 1979 and came into force on September 3, 1981.

Important Provisions of CEDAW
The CEDAW has 30 Articles. Some important provisions are, defining the term ‘Discrimination Against Women’ as ‘any distinction, exclusion, or restriction, made on the basis of sex’,  measures to achieve Principle of Equality, full development and advancement of Women, Modification of Social and Cultural Patterns of  Conduct, Suppression of All Forms of Traffic in Women, Equality of Women with Men ‘in Political Life, at International Level, regards to nationality, in the Field of Education, in the field of Employment, before law, relating to marriage and family relations’, Equal Access to Health Care Services, Establishment of a Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and related ‘rules of Procedure and its Officers, meetings of the committee, it’s report with recommendations’, A Report on Legislative, Judicial and administrative Measures, Request for Revision of the Present Convention, and Reservations by States.

Criticism from States
Many countries have specifically objected that they would not implement some of the provisions of the Convention because of their political, constitutional, cultural, or religious compulsions and reasons.
1.      Some states objected to the obligation on the part of the States to enter into contractual agreements with the UN to the effect that they would take all necessary measures to ensure the equality of women.
2.      Many states objected to the provision of equality of women and men within the family.
As a result such reservations violate and nullify the very basis and essence of the Conventions.

CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD
The rights of a child, including his/her well-being and protection remained and important issue on the agenda of United Nations since its inception. Towards this objective United Nations set up the United Nation’s Children Fund on Dec. 11, 1946 which is now the primary organization of the U.N. responsible for international assistance to children.
Three landmark documents of Human Rights taken special note of the Child Rights. UDHR lays down right to special care and assistance during motherhood and childhood. ICCPR provided for Right against Death Sentence for persons below 18 years and pregnant women. It also guarantees the Right to Protection without any discrimination, right to registration and name and right to nationality. And ICESCR (1966) provides for the Right to Special Protection and assistance, Right against Economic and social exploitation, and an obligation of the States, to take measures for Healthy development of the Child.
THE DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 1959.     
The first U.N. Declaration, exclusively devoted to the rights of children, was the Declaration of the Rights of the Child. It affirmed the principle of “the best interests of the child” meaning thereby that “mankind owes to the child the best, it has to give.” It served as moral framework for the rights of the Child.

CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (1989)
                                               
It is at the backdrop of the above discussed developments the U.N.General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Rights of The Child in the year 1989 which was submitted by The Commission on Human Rights.
The Convention calls upon all states
1.      to make the rights of children widely known to adults and children alike, by making its widest possible publicity in their respective territories, and
2.      to make their reports, on the implementation of the principles and provisions of the Convention, available to their public at large in their own States.
Further, it specified that, as the child is a subject of law, all human rights-political, civil, economic, social and cultural- which are considered to be essential for his/her survival, development, participation and protection, are “interdependent and indivisible.”

SUMMARY OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD

1.      Re-affirmation of the Principle of “The Best Interests of the Child”: The convention re-affirms the principle of “the best interests of the Child” which should be the basic consideration in all matters and decisions, which vitally affect the interests of the child.
2.      Protection against Sexual and Economic Exploitation: The Convention protects the child agaist sexual and economic exploitation, emergency situations, ill-treatment, abandonment, and armed conflicts and ensures assistance to those children, who seek refugee status.
3.      Protection Against Torture and Capital Punishment: The Convention calls upon the States not to subject children to torture and capital punishment or life ijprisonment for offence, committed by persons below 18 years of age.
4.      Right to Health, Care, Education and Leisure: The Convention guarantees to every child the right to health, care, education and leisure. It calls upon States to provide special care to the disabled children.
5.      Right to have a Name and Nationality: The Convention laid down tha every childf shall have the right to a name and nationality from birth, and to preserve his/her identity for the whole life.
6.      Parental Responsibility for the upbringing of the Child: The convention laid down that it shall be primary responsibility of both parents to upbringing their children properly.
7.      Children, not to be separated from their Parents: The convention lays down that, as far as possible, children should not be separated from their parents except where the competent authorities so determine. However, in such cases, children have a right to maintain personal relations with their parents.
8.      Right of the child to respect for his/her Views: The Convention recognizes and ensures the right of the child to respect for his/her views. It says that the children shall have the right to express their views on matters affecting them and that these views should be considered, with due weight according to the age and maturity of the children.
9.      Right against Discrimination: The Convention, in clear and unmistakable terms, lays down the fundamental principle of non-discrimination on any ground. It states that all children shall enjoy all the rights, guaranteed to them, under the Convention, without any discrimination, irrespective of the child’s or his/her parent’s, or legal guardian’s, race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.
10.  Need of International Co-operation and Technical Assistance: The convention recognizes the important role, being played by international co-operation and technical assistance, in ensuring respect for the rights of the child especially in the developing countries in the third world.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q. 2.   Describe the contents of Three Generations of Human Rights.
Answer:

The movement for Human Rights spread in various dimensions achieving step by step success in its objectives since Seventeenth century onwards. This journey of Human Rights can be traced while classifying it in three Generations.

FIRST GENERATION:

The Civil and Political Human Rights are collectively known as the “First Generation” of human rights. These are in the form of injunctions against the State. They are also known as the “Liberty Oriented Human Rights” because these rights collectively provide, protect and guarantee individual liberty to an individual against the State and its agencies.

Civil Human Rights
The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries contributed and strengthened the civil rights, which assured civil liberties, property, the right to justice and the right to conclude valid contracts. The demand for civil rights in 17th and 18th centuries was a demand against the State and its various authorities and agencies and also against oppression and arbitrariness.
The civil human rights are always guaranteed to all persons within the territory of the State. The long drawn struggle for these rights resulted in to the recognition in UDHR, 1948 & ICCPR,1966. Some important among them are as follows;
1)                  Right to Life
2)                  Right against Torture, or Inhuman Treatment
3)                  Right to Liberty and Security of Persons
4)                  Right against slavery
5)                  Right to Human Dignity
6)                  Right to Freedom of Movement and Residence
7)                  Right to Recognition as a  Person Before Law
8)                  Right to Equality Before  the law
9)                  Right to Fair and Public Trial
10)              Rights of the Arrested Person
11)              Right to Privacy, Family, Correspondence and Reputation
12)              Right to freedom of Thought, Conscience and  Religion
13)              Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
14)              Right to Peaceful Assembly
15)              Right to Freedom of Association
16)              Right to Marry and Found a Family
17)              Right to Protection of a Child
18)              Rights of Minorities
19)              Right to enjoy natural Wealth and Resources
20)              Right to seek asylum from Persecution
21)              Right to and Effective Remedy for Violation of Fundamental Rights
22)              Restrictions on the Enjoyment of Civil Rights

Political Human Rights
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries contributed to the strengthening of political rights, which enable the citizens of the State to take part in the government of the state directly or through the periodically elected representatives at periodic, genuine elections, to be conducted on the basis of universal adult suffrage. Political human rights, are guaranteed only to the citizens of the State.
Following are the political human rights, declared under UDHR, and ICCPR.
1)                  Right to Self-determination
2)                  Right to take Part in the Government of the Country
3)                  Right to have an Equal Access to Public Services
4)                  Right to petition.
5)                  Right to Criticise the Government of the Day
6)                  Right to Nationality

SECOND GENERATION:
            The economic, social, and cultural rights, including the rights of the minorities are collectively known as the “Second Generation” of Human Rights. They are also known as the “Security Oriented Human Rights” because these rights collectively provide and guarantee the essential security in the life of and individual.
            The twentieth century contributed to the development and strengthening of economic, social and cultural rights and the rights of minorities as well. These rights aim at promotion of the economic and social security through economic and social upliftment of the weaker sections of the society. These rights are essential for dignity of personhood as well as for full and free development of human personality in all possible directions. These rights ensure a minimum of economic welfare of the masses and their basic material needs, recognized by the society as essential for civilized living. The demand for such rights in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was made in the form of claims or demands upon the state-a claim that it is the responsibility and liability of the State to provide and guarantee “the means for actualizing the individual’s happiness and will-being.”
            Following are the important economic rights, declared under the UDHR, 1948, and the ICESCR, 1966.
1)                  Right to property
2)                  Right to Work
3)                  Right to Equal Pay for Equal Work
4)                  Right to Form and Join Trade Unions.
5)                  Right to Strike the Work
6)                  Right to Minimum Standard of living
Following are the social and cultural human rights, recognized and guaranteed to all persons within the State under the UDHR.
1)                  Right to Social security
2)                  Right to Rest and Leisure
3)                  Right to Protection of Motherhood and Childhood
4)                  Right to Education
5)                  Right to Protection of Moral and material Interests
6)                  Right to Marriage and Found a Family
7)                  Right to Maternity Benefits.
8)                  Right to Cultural Life.

THIRD GENERATION:

           The “Development Oriented Human Rights” are known as the “Third Generation” of Human Rights.
            They are of a very recent origin in the late twentieth century. These Human Rights enable an individual to participate in the process of all round development and include environmental rights, that enable and individual to enjoy the absolutely free gifts of nature, namely, air, water, food, and natural resources, free from pollution and contamination.
            Since the human being is at the central subject of the development process in every human society, therefore, it is the primary responsibility of every State and its various agencies to create conditions, favorable to the development of its peoples and individuals. Thus, right to Development is and inalienable human right. These rights are provided under the Declaration on the Right to Development, adopted on 4th December, 1986 by the U.N. General Assembly.
           
          The protection and improvement of human environment affects favourably not only the well-being of people but the economic development as well as throughout the world. It is, therefore, the birth right of every individual to enjoy the natural environment free from the pollution. Potable drinking water, fresh air, protection and conservation of forests and ecology, are now very much part of the right to life.
           




Issues in International Politics(TYBA- PAPER VI):Unipolarity- Bipolarity-Multipolarity


With collapse of Berlin wall in 1989 and Dissolution of U.S.S.R. in 1991 the world politics ushered in new era of international relations. These events celebrate the end of the Cold War which categorized the post World War II international stage. These new developments left the analysts and statesmen struggling with the problem of how to understand the world order.  One line of thinking views this situation in terms of polarity. Polarity in international relation is a description of the distribution of power within the international system. It describes the nature of the international system at any given period of time. Polarity has three types. Unipolarity, Bipolarity and Multipolarity. The type of system is completely dependent on the distribution of power and influence of states in a region or internationally.
‘Unipolarity in international politics describes a distribution of power in which there is one state with most of the cultural, economic and military influence. This is also called a hegemony or hyper power’.
Examples
Egyptian Empire from 3150 BC to 664 BC, the Greeks ( 776 BC to 146 BC), the Persian Empire (550 BC to 330 BC), the Roman Empire (31 BC to 5th Century), Mongolian Empire (13th and 14th Century), Ottoman Empire (15th to 17th Century), the French Empire (during the reigns of Louis XIV and Napoleon I) are regional and The British Empire (from the end of Napoleonic wars to the beginning of the 20th Century), The U.S.A. (with the fall of the Soviet Union since 1991) are some of the global examples of Unipolarity.
‘Bipolarity in international politics describes a distribution of power in which two states have the majority of economic, military and cultural influence internationally or regionally.’
Examples
The U.S. and Soviet Union during Cold War, Great Britain and France during colonial era.
‘Multipolarity in international politics describes a distribution of power in which more than two nation-states have nearly equal amounts of military, cultural and economic influence.’
Ever since it became clear that U.S.S.R. was calling off the Cold War, as said above political analysts and statesmen, diplomats engaged in describing the international relations.  
American diplomats began their quest to define a new American role in the new emerging world order. Countries belonging to the Cold War blocks as an ally to U.S. or U.S.S.R. began contemplating their place while those non aligned countries which struggled to maintain their independent foreign policies during cold war recognized the need to rethink their strategies keeping their national interests in mind.
This was based on certain assumptions, first, the old bipolar world would beget a multipolar world with power dispersed to new centers in Japan, Germany (and/or “Europe”), China and a diminished Soviet Union/Russia; second, in the post-Soviet strategic environment the threat of war would be dramatically diminished. Scholarly opinion is divided on this issue, for some the world order is now Unipolar while some advocate that it is now essentially multipolar.
Advocates of Unipolarity maintain that the center of world power is the unchallenged super power, the United States, attended by its Western allies. Her economic, military and political superiority seemed an undisputed fact. And the emergence of a new strategic environment, marked by the rise of small aggressive states armed with weapons of mass destruction and possessing the means to deliver them, makes the coming decades a time of heightened, not diminished threat of war. While responding to the claim that the world after Cold War will be multipolar with Germany (and/or Europe) and Japan are rivals for U.S. on critic commented that,
“The notions that economic power inevitably translates into geopolitical influence is a materialist illusion. Economic power is a necessary condition for great power status. But it certainly is not sufficient, as has been made clear by the … behavior of Germany and Japan, which have generally hidden under the table since the first shots rang out in Kuwait.”
The “Unipolar Moment” as envisioned by some since the end of Cold War, in which U.S. was imagined as imperial ‘hyper power’ in a world was termed as hallucinatory moment in history by some. And the role of U.S. as first ‘hyper power’ was termed as French hyperbole. Instead U.S. as “indispensable power” or “leader of the democratic world” called for attention to describe America’s status in the world today.
There is a huge gap between America’s Military capacity and its actual ability to bend events according to its wish. A U.S $11 trillion economy facilitates enormous technological prowess and a defense budget that exceeds the combined total of the next 25 powers. Its ability, however, to unilaterally use that power-military and economic in a unipolar world, is hampered by reality. In words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, “Preponderance should not be confused with omnipotence,” In Vietnam war with the death toll of 58000, U.S. was unable to avoid defeat. Iraq after two wars is still an unresolved case. The U.S. military, spread thinly by its global commitments, is straining to provide the men and money necessary to secure an end to the conflict. Mean while, should a crisis break out elsewhere, the U.S. is no longer in position to engage forcefully.
The war on terrorism is a global war unlike two world war of 20th century, far more complex than a massive deployment of men and munitions against a clearly perceived enemy state or coalition of states. In this war, terrorism is not even the actual enemy: It is a battle tactic used by an elusive, globally dispersed, well funded enemy. This enemy also boasts the latest resources in global communications, along with financial and personnel mobility. Building a world wide coalition of allies to fight such an enemy is not a policy choice. It is the only optional in a war without conventional battlefields.
Today, the U.S. possesses by far the largest pile of sophisticated weaponry on earth, yet its conventional military power is severely stretched in fighting one and a quarter war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, its nuclear edge is tempered by the other nations- including China-India, and Russia, which have large, conventional forces and demographic depth that have the means to respond with substantial nucleus retaliation. Even tiny North Korea, with may be a half-dozen bombs, has become hard to tackle.
The formidable superiority of U.S. economic power is also under threat. The rapidly ballooning expense of the Iraq war is widening already huge budget deficits. This is also intensifying a gathering US fiscal crisis of growing debt, now financed by foreign capital. Thanks to persistently large current account debits, the US in 2003 borrowed from abroad at an unprecedented rate of US $ 4 billion a day.
Distribution of power in the world has fundamentally altered over the two decades since end of the Cold War. Claim of U.S. leadership and the post cold war conversion of “peace dividend” in the global liberal order have no more takers. Many saw the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as the symbols of a global imperialism/imperial overstretch. Every expenditure has weakened America’s armed forces, and each assertion of power has weakened resistance in the form of terrorist networks, insurgent groups and “asymmetric” weapons like suicide bombers. America’s unipolar moment has inspired diplomatic and financial countermovements o block American bullying and construct an alternate world order. At best, America’s unipolar moment lasted through the 1990s, but that was also a decade adrift. European Union and China are the two emerging competitors successfully challenged the American hegemony in the geo politics of the 21st century.
Europe is a global balancer between America and China. Absence of common army does not affect its capacity to do it. Europe use intelligence and the police to apprehend radical Islamists, social policy to try to integrate restive Muslim populations and economic strength to incorporate the former Soviet Union. European investment in Turkey is growing and binding it closer to the E.U. New pipeline route transporting oil and gas from Libya, Algeria or Azerbaijan to Europe is making E.U. efficient in energy sector.
Its market is the world’s largest, European technologies more and more set the global standard and European countries give the most development assistance. And a safer option for investment if conflict broke out between America and China. Euro is strengthening its hold on global economy. Persian Gulf oil exporters are diversifying their currency holding into euros. President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela went on to suggest Euros. While London taking over as the world’s financial capital for stock listing, it’s no surprise that China’s new state investment fund intends to locate its main Western offices there instead of New York. Mean while, America’s share of global exchange reserves has dropped to 65 percent.
And Europe’s political influence grows at America’s expense. While America fumbles at nation-building. Europe spends its money and political capital on locking peripheral countries into its orbit. Africa wants African Union like European Union. Activists in the Middle East want parliamentary democracy like Europe’s not American style presidential. Foreign students who were shunned after 9/11 joined London and Berlin: twice as many Chinese study in Europe as in the U.S. America controls legacy institutions few seem to want (I.M.F.) while Europe excels at building new and sophisticated ones modeled on itself.
China
China is cutting massive resource and investment deals from Canada to Cuba to Chavez’s Venezuela. In Africa, China is not only securing energy supplies; it is also making major strategic investments in the financial sector. China’s spectacular rise is evidenced by the ballooning share of trade in its gross domestic product. Every country in the world currently considered a rogue state by the U.S. now enjoys a diplomatic, economic or strategic lifeline from China, Iran being the most prominent example.
Aided by 35 million-strong ethnic Chinese Diaspora well placed around East Asia’s rising economies, a Greater Chinese Co-Prosperity Sphere has emerged. China has slashed tariffs and increased loans to its Southeast Asian neighbors. Trade within the India-Japan-Australia triangle-of which China sits at the center- has surpassed trade across the Pacific.
Small Asian nation-states are increasingly rallying toward China out of Asian cultural pride and an understanding of the historical-cultural reality of Chinese dominance. And in the former Soviet Central Asian countries-the so-called ‘Stans’-China is the new heavy weight player, its manifest destiny pushing its Hans pioneers westward while pulling defunct microstates like Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, as well as oil-rich Kazakhstan, into its orbit. The shanghai Cooperation Organization gathers these Central Asian strongmen together with China and Russia and may eventually become the “NATO of the East.”

Issues In international Politics (TYBA- PAPER VI)The General Assembly


The General Assembly is the main deliberative body of the U.N. It is composed of all UN members, each with one vote. It meets once every year. The President of the G.A. is elected for every session Twenty-one vice-presidents and chairmen of the six committees of the Assembly are also elected. Special sessions may also be convened at the request of the Security Council or a majority of UN members or when requested by a member concurred with by a majority of the rest. Emergency special sessions are also held.
The GA can discuss any matter within the scope of the UN Charter and give suggestions on questions and issues provided they are not already on the agenda of the Security Council.
When lack of unanimity among members in the Security Council render it unable to fulfil its primary responsibility of ensuring world peace in the face of aggression or breach of peace, the GA can consider the issue and make suggestions for collective action in order to restore a peaceful and secure international climate.
It receives and studies reports from other UN organs as well as the annual report of the Secretary-General on the functioning of the UNO; admits new members; directs activities for development; set policies and determines programmes for the secretariat; appoints the Secretary-General; and approves the UN budget.
Where decisions are concerned, two-thirds majority of members is required on important issues such as peace and security, new membership and budgetary matters; a simple majority would do in other cases.
The GA’s work is carried on by six main committees-the Disarmament and International Security Committee, Economic and Financial Committee, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee, Special Political and Decolonization Committee, Administrative and Budgetary Committee, and Legal Committee. The Assembly president along with its vice-presidents and chairmen of the main committees constitutes the 29 member General Committee which coordinates the Assembly proceedings and proceedings of the committees. There is also the nine member Credentials committee which is constituted at the start of every GA session to study the credentials of delegates. The GA has a couple of standing committees, namely, a committee on Contributions and an advisory Committee.

Subsidiary Bodies

The Assembly’s ad hoc bodies for addressing specific issues are the Special Committee on Peace-keeping Operations, Conference on Disarmament, International Law Commission, UN Commission on International Trade Law, Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Conciliation Commission for Palestine, Special Committee on the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to the Colonial Countries and Peoples and Special Committee on the Policies of Apartheid of the Government of the Republic of South Africa.

Issues in International Politics (TYBA- PAPER VI):The United Nations Security Council



The United Nations Security Council
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC), established in 1946 and located in New York City is the organ of the United Nations charged with the maintenance of international peace and security.
Its powers, outlined in the United Nations Charter, include the establishment of peace keeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions regimes, and the authorization for military action. Its powers are exercised through United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
The basic structure of the UNSC is set out in Chapter V of the UN Charter. The chair of the president rotates in alphabetical order of the Security Council member nations names in English.
The role of president of the Security Council involves setting the agenda, presiding at its meetings and overseeing any crisis.
There are two categories of membership in the UN Security Council: permanent members and elected members.
The Council seated five permanent members who were originally drawn from the victorious powers of the World War II: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, The United States of America, The French Republic, The Republic of China, The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (now Russia). Two of the original members, the Republic of China and Soviet Union, were later replaced by recognized successor states. In 1971 The People’s Republic of China was awarded the permanent seat as a successor to The Republic of China and in 1991, Russia, being the legal successor state to the Soviet Union, acquired the originally-Soviet seat, including the Soviet Union’s former representation in the Security Council. These changes were done without amending Article 23 of the Charter of the United Nations.
The five permanent members of the Security Council are the only nations recognized as possessing nuclear weapons under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, although it lacks universal validity, as some nuclear nations have not signed the treaty. This nuclear status is not the result of their Security Council membership, though it is sometimes used as a modern-day justification for their continued presence on the body. India, Pakistan, and North Korea possess nuclear weapons outside of the anti-proliferation framework established by the Treaty. Each permanent member has the power to veto any substantive resolution.
Under Article 27 of the UN Charter, Security Council decisions on all substantive matters require the affirmative votes of nine members. A negative vote, or veto, by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal, even if it has received the required number of affirmative votes. Abstention is not regarded as a veto despite the wording of the Charter.
Since the security Council’s inception, China has used its veto 6 times; France 18 times; Russia/USSR 122 times; the U.K. 32 times; and the U.S. 81 times. The majority of Russian/Soviet vetoes were in the first ten years of the Council’s existence. Since 1984, China has vetoed three resolutions; France three; Russia/USSR four; the U.K. ten; and the U.S. 43. Procedural matters are not subject to a veto, so the veto cannot be used to avoid discussion of an issue.
In 1965, amendments to articles 23 and 27 of the Charter came into effect, increasing the number of elected members from six to ten. These members are elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms starting on 1st January, with five replaced each year. The members are chosen by regional groups and confirmed by the United Nations General Assembly. The African bloc chooses three members; the Latin America and the Caribbean, Asian, and Western European and Others blocs choose two members each; and the Eastern European bloc choose one member. Also, one of these members is an Arab Country, alternatively from the Asian or African bloc.
Until 2000 Israel was the only United Nations member country not a member of any regional group and so could not be elected to the Security Council or become involved in many consultative UN bodies. Israel would normally fall within the Asia group but many Arab states blocked Israel’s inclusion in this group. In 2000 Israel was granted temporary membership in the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) and this was extended indefinitely in 2004.
A state that is a member of the UN, but not of the Security Council, may participate in Security Council discussions in matters by which the Council agrees that the country’s interests are particularly affected.
The Security Council of the United Nations has primary responsibility under the UN Charter for the maintenance of international peace and security, and its resolutions are binding on all member states.
The Council recommends the name of new secretaries-general, new State members of the UN, and it elects judges to the International Court of Justice, jointly with the General Assembly.
In the key realm of peace and security, it performs three main functions.
  1. It assists in the peaceful settlement of disputes.
  2. It establishes and oversees UN peace-keeping forces, and
  3. It takes enforcement measures against recalcitrant States or other parties.
The UN’s role in international collective security is defined by the UN Charter, which gives the Security Council the power to:
  1. Investigate any situation threatening international peace;
  2. Recommend procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute;
  3. Economic sanctions: Call upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations; and
  4. Enforce its decisions militarily, or by any means necessary.
Under Chapter Six of the Charter, “Pacific Settlement of Disputes”, the Security Council “may investigate any dispute or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute”.
The Council may “recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment” if it determines that the situation might endanger international peace and security. These recommendations are not binding on UN members.
Acting under Chapter VI of the Charter, the Council ‘shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties’ to a dispute to settle it by peaceful means such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, or judicial settlement (Article 33). And it may, if all the parties to a dispute request make recommendations to the parties with a view to a peaceful settlement (Article 38). In practice, the Council often asks the Secretary-General or one of his Special Representatives to mediate or negotiate under guidelines the Council has established. Increasingly the Council members themselves have traveled to conflict areas in an effort to directly negotiate settlements or mediate conflicts.
Though the first UN peace-keeping force was established by the General Assembly, subsequent forces have been established by the Security Council, which exercises authority and command over them. The Council delegates to the Secretary-General its powers to organize and to exercise command and control over the force, but it retains close management and oversight -- too much so in the view of many Secretariat officials and military commanders. Though the Charter does not expressly provide powers to the Council for peace-keeping forces, the International Court of Justice in a 1962 case found that the Council has an implied power for this purpose.
Peacekeeping forces are usually deployed by the Council only after ceasefires have been agreed upon and so the peacekeepers are only lightly armed and should not be confused with an army fighting an opposing force.
Under Chapter Seven, the Council has broader power to decide what measures are to be taken in situations involving “threats to the peace, breaches of the peace, or acts of aggression”. In such situations, the Council is not limited to recommendations but may take action, including the use of armed force “to maintain or restore international peace and security”. This was the basis for UN armed action in Korea in 1950 during the Korean War and the use of coalition forces in Iraq and Kuwait in 1991. Decisions taken under Chapter Seven, such as economic sanctions, are binding on UN members.
The ‘peace’ referred to in Article 39 may involve conflicts other than those between states. At the time the Charter was established, it was envisaged that conflicts within the borders of a state could also constitute a threat to or breach of the peace, and thus that the Council could order the use of enforcement measures. The Council has broadened its definition of these cases over time, so that gross violations of human rights may now be seen as a threat to the peace, as was the case with the genocide in Rwanda.
In exercising its enforcement powers, the Security Council has imposed economic sanctions against a number of States and other parties.
Under Article 42 of the Charter, the Security Council has the power to order the use of force to maintain or restore peace and security.
Nonetheless the Security Council has delegated its Chapter VII powers to member States who volunteer their forces to carry out the enforcement action. These delegations of power include a delegation of a power of command and control over such forces, usually to those volunteering. Recently, the Council has delegated its enforcement powers to NATO in certain Balkan conflicts, to a force assembled by the Economic Community of West African States in Liberia and Sierra Leone, and to a multinational force led by Australia in East Timor.
The Council has delegated its Chapter VII powers to member States for the attainment of various objectives including to counter a use of force, to carry out a naval interdiction against a state, to achieve humanitarian objectives, to protect UN declared 'safe areas,' and to ensure implementation of a peace agreement.
The U.N. has helped prevent many outbreaks of international violence from growing into wider conflicts. It has opened the way to negotiated settlements through its service as a centre of debate and negotiation, as well as through UN- sponsored fact-finding missions, mediators, and truce observers. UN Peacekeeping forces, made up of troops and equipment supplied by member nations have usually been able to limit or prevent conflict, although sometimes not, some conflicts, however, have proven to be beyond the capacity of the UN to influence. Key to the success of UN peacekeeping efforts is the willingness of the parties to a conflict to come to terms peacefully through a viable political process.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court recognizes that the Security Council has authority to refer cases to the Court, where the Court could not otherwise exercise jurisdiction.
UN Security Council Resolution, 1674, adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 28 April 2006, “reaffirms the provisions of paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 World summit Outcome Document regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity”. The resolution commits the Council to action to protect civilians in armed conflict.
  • Security Council Resolutions are legally binding if they are made under Chapter VII (Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression) of the Charter. Resolutions made under Chapter VI (Pacific Settlement of Disputes), however, have no enforcement mechanisms and are generally considered to have no binding force under international law.
  • Those resolutions made outside these two Chapters dealing with the internal governance of the organization (such as admission of new Member States) are legally binding where the Charter gives the Security Council power to make them.
  • If the council cannot reach consensus or a passing vote on a resolution, they may choose to produce a non-binding presidential statement instead of a Resolution. These are adopted by consensus. They are meant to apply political pressure- a warning that the council is paying attention and further action may follow.
Press statements typically accompany both resolutions and presidential statements, carrying the text of the document adopted by the body and also some explanatory text. They may also be released independently, after a significant meeting.
There has been discussion of increasing the number of permanent members. The countries who have made the strongest demands for permanent seats are Brazil, Germany, India and Japan. Japan and Germany are the UN’s second and third largest funders respectively, while Brazil, the largest Latin American nation, and India, the world’s largest democracy and second most populous country, are two of the largest contributors of troops to UN-mandated peace-keeping missions.
Since 1946 in last 62 years of its existence The Security Council came under heavy criticisms for various reasons.
Ø It is accused that the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council have created an exclusive nuclear club whose powers are unchecked. The U.N.S.C. does not truly represent the international community. It only addresses the strategic interests and political motives of the permanent members, especially in humanitarian interventions – for example, protecting the oil-rich Kuwaitis in 1991 but poorly protecting resource-poor Rwandans in 1994.
Ø Another target of criticism is the veto power of the five permanent nations. One veto from any of the five permanent members can halt any possible action the Council may take. One nation’s objection, rather than the opinions of a majority of nations, may cripple any possible UN armed or diplomatic response to a crisis. Since 1982, the US has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members. However, Russia (and including formerly the Soviet Union) issued 122 vetoes while the United States only issued a total of 81 vetoes since the formation of the Security Council.
Ø Some critics question its effectiveness and relevance because in most high profile cases, there are essentially no consequences for violating a Security Council resolution. In Darfur crisis, in which Arab Janjaweed militias, supported by the Sudanese Government, committed ethnic cleansing and genocide against the indigenous population and estimated 300,000 civilians have been killed, yet U.N failed to act against this severe human rights issue. Despite of presence of U.N. forces Serbian troops committed genocide against Bosnian Muslims in the largest case of mass murder on the European continent since World War II.
Ø Some argue that the powerful Security Council system does not have distinctions between the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches: the UN Charter gives all three powers to the Security Council.
  • United Nations Security Council; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ United_Nations _ Security_Council; accessed on 8/21/2008
  • Security Council Reform; http://www.globalpolicy. org/security/reform /index. htm; accessed on 8/21/2008
  • UN and World Security in the Next Millennium; http://www.globalpolicy.org /security/reform/logos99.htm; accessed on 8/21/2008
  • James, Paul and Celine Nahory; Theses towards a Democratic Reform of the UN Security Council; http://www.globalpolicy.org /security/reform/2005 /0713 theses. htm; accessed on 8/21/2008
  • Dan Sarooshi; Security Council; http://www.globalpolicy.org /security/gensc. htm; accessed on 8/21/2008
  • Glennon Michael; Why the Security Council Failed; Foreign Affairs, 1 May 2003; http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/article; accessed on 8/21/2008