- ¨ Definitions, Nature and Scope
- ¨ Normative and Empirical
Approaches
- ¨ Feminist Approach
Introduction:
Politics exists
everywhere. It is all-pervading and as old as human beings. Politics prevails
in every sphere of human life. Whether one likes or not virtually no one is
completely beyond the reach of some kind of political system.
Political
science is a social science and like its sister subjects it revolves around man
and his social (Political) environment. Being one of the oldest social sciences
its nature and scope of the study have undergone several changes over the
centuries. Political Science first began
with the Greeks. The term ‘Politics’ is derived from the Greek word ‘Polis’
which means ‘city-states’ (Polity meaning Government, politeia meaning Constitution)
and each city in those days was an independent state, a principality in its own
right. E.g. Athens, Sparta, Corinth etc.
Aristotle is
regarded as “the father of Political science” on account of his far reaching and
permanent contribution to the field of politics. He called politics the Master
Science because politics determines the environment within which every person
will organize his life. No one can
escape from the parameters set by politics. In his famous book ‘Politics’
Aristotle wrote , “ Man is by nature a Political Animal and he who is by nature
or by accident is without state is either above humanity or below it.” Politics
is the control room of all human activities.
Definitions of Politics or Political Science:
The word
politics has different interpretations. From Plato to Easton it has been
interpreted in different ways. Definitions of politics vary according to the
variety of activities that have been considered political from time to time.
Though the study of politics existed in some form since the time of Aristotle,
the discipline was indistinguishable from moral philosophy and the study of
society in general until early 19th century. Its independence as a
field of study was established only in the later part of 19th
century.
Early Definitions or Traditional View of Politics:
According to
the traditional political scientist from the early part of 20th
century such as J W Garner, Henry Sidgwick, R G Gettel and others Politics deals
mainly with study of state and government or related institutions.
R G Gettel defined politics as “the study of the
state in the past, present and future, of political organization and political
function, of political institutions and political theories.”
According to Laski “the study of politics concerns
itself with the life of man in relation to organized states.”
According to Garner, “Political science begins and
ends with state.”
According to Leacock, “Political science deals with
government.”
Thus from
above definitions it is clear that the traditional view of politics was narrow,
static and limited and included only the study of state and government, its
structure and organisation etc.
Modern view of Political Science:
1) Power view
The dawn of
the 20th century saw fresh ground being covered by political
scientist such as Laswell, Powell, Merriam, Morgenthau, weber etc. A more
realistic analysis of political activity is contained in the definitions of
politics in terms of power.
Harold Laswell defining politics in empirical
terms maintains that politics is the study of the shaping and sharing of power.
The fundamental issue in politics according to him is who gets what, when and
how?
Robert Dahl holds that, “politics involves to a
significant extent power, rule or authority.”
According to Shaw and Pierce politics is the
struggle for power to make authoritative decisions for the whole society.
Definitions
emphasizing power focused attention on the fact that functions are more important
than forms or structures. Power is indeed a central idea of politics and
examining this element takes political enquiry into the core of the matter.
2) Legitimacy of the government:
As the power
view of politics was found to be defective and inadequate, attempts were made
to modify it by an appeal to the legitimacy of the government. It was said that only legitimate power would
become the basis for the acceptance of the government. David Easton assigned a
moral function to the exercise of power by asking for the “authoritative
allocation of values for the society.” This view also suggests that modern
political analysis is concerned with political system. Demands are made on the
system and they are processed and policy decisions are made. This has to be done
under the authority of the government i.e. policies have to emanate from
legitimate or rightful sources.
3) Controversy and Conflict:
Another
important element in the study of politics is controversy and conflict. Vermon
von dyke observes, “Politics consists of struggle among actors pursuing
conflicting desires on public issues.” Conflict is basic to politics. Therefore
conflict resolution or reconciliation of antagonistic interest becomes
essential in political studies.
4) Consensus & General Arrangements:
The study of
politics also includes the element of consensus and general arrangements of
society. Politics is necessitated because diversities in social environment
cause conflicting demands on the common good. “If men were angels no government
would be necessary.” Governments and political system act as mediator to
generate consensus in the society.
5) Internationalism:
Another view
is that politics is concerned with internationalism. The study of
internationalism is necessary for world peace, and to have modern welfare
state.
6) Behavioral approach:
Almond Powell
and other modern American writers have studied political science by
sociological, anthropological and psychological methods and criticised the
traditional theory of political science on the grounds of parochialism and
formalism. Their contention is that the political theorist in the past
concentrated mainly on the state, government, institutions and their legal
norms, rules, regulations or political ideas and ideologies. They did not concern
themselves with the performance of institutions, their interaction and
political behavior of man. This marked the beginning of Behavioural approach in
politics and later also adopted a comparative studies of different political
systems across continents.
Changing nature of
Politics: Is Political science a Science or Art?
Whether
politics can be considered a science has been a long standing controversy.
Aristotle adopted a scientific approach to the study of the discipline. He
separated the study of politics form ethics and law, examined and compared
constitutions (158) and classified governments into meaningful categories. On
the other hand James Bryce, Charles Beard and Harold Laski are of the opinion
that politics is not a science. It is said that the nomenclature Political
Science owes its origin to William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft.
Science is
systematised body of knowledge about any phenomenon which is governed by its
own laws. Science is based on collection of data, generalisations, accuracy and
verification or experimentations. Let’s try to test political science on these
grounds.
Political Science is not a Science:
1) Lacks Precise and Uniform Definitions:
A Science has
a set of its own terms and their precise and standard definitions. Political science lacks precise definitions,
terminologies and methods. There is no general agreement among political
scientist regarding these. Methods and principles of political science are not
universally acceptable and applicable. E.g. terms like freedom, democracy,
nationalism do not have uniform definitions. They can be and have been defined
and interpreted in different ways.
2) Lacks Investigation and generalistions:
Political
science also lacks scientific method of investigations, observations and
generalisations. It is possible to obtain exact results in science which is not
the case with political science. E.g. Democracy is regarded as the best form of
government by many but in reality it is not a success in countries where there
are ignorant and incompetent masses.
3) Lacks Experimentations:
Another
difficulty in political science is that it not possible to have laboratory
experiments in political science. Political researcher has to deal with human
beings. The habits, sentiments, moods, and temperament of people differ from
place to place and from time to time. They cannot be controlled as well under
any circumstance. E.g. electoral behavior of voter is determined by various
factors such as caste, class, religion etc. No government can claim that its people
will react in a particular way to a policy or programme announced.
4) Lacks Objectivity:
While there is
objectivity in the study of physical sciences, it is lacking in studying
problems related to state and government. A completely impartial, indifferent,
unbiased attitude may not be possible to analyse political problems and
questions. A political scientist has to deal with human beings in relation to
sate, society and government and in such relations the element of subjectivity
is most conspicuous. Views of political thinkers are bound to be prejudiced or
coloured on account of racial, religious, linguistic or nationalistic factors.
5)
Lacks Predictability:
Is is nearly
impossible for a political thinker to predict the future course of events. In
fact events take course quite contrary to the expectations of the observer.
This happens because politics studies human behaviour and social constructs
which are vulnerable to change. Constantly changing socio-economic and
political situations restrict a political observer form making predictions.
Thus it was
rightly observed by Burke that, “
there is no science of politics any more than there is science of aesthetics-
for the line of politics are not the lines of mathematics. They are matter
incapable of exact definitions.”
Political Science is a Science:
1) If by the
term science we mean a systematized body of knowledge political science can
certainly be called as a science. Dr. Finer rightly says that, “we can be
prophets of probable if not seers of certain” political science has been able
develop a systematised body of knowledge on broad terms like state, government
etc. after due observation, comparison and some sort of experimentation.
2) It is
possible to conduct some experiments through which political scientist can
benefit. It is well known that Aristotle based his ‘Politics’ on his study of
the working of 158 constitutions. Likewise, Lord Bryce compared the working of
democracy in various countries and then came to conclusions with regard to
relative merits and demerits of democracy. B N Rau constitutional advisor to
the government of India also made a comparative study of various constitutions
and presented a report to the constituent assembly.
3) It is true
that there is no consensus among experts regarding the method, principles and
conclusions of political science. But political science is a dynamic study of
living subject-matter. It deals with man and his institutions. As man is
dynamic, the same is true of the institutions created by him. The nature of man
changes with the changing conditions.
The view of
Lord Bryce is that political science is a science, although it is undeveloped
and incomplete. Prof. R N Gilchrist believes that general laws can be deduced
from given material and those are useful in the actual problems of the
government.
Scope of
Political Science
There is no
unanimity among scholars regarding the scope of political science. There is
lack of precision in the definitions and meanings of political science and that
creates confusion regarding the precise boundaries of the subject.
According to
Willoughby, political science has to deal with three great topics: State,
Government and Law. The view of Prof. Goodnow is that political science divided
itself into three distinct parts: the expression of the state will, the content
of the state will as expressed and the execution of the state will. At the
UNESCO conference held in September 1948, distinguished political scientists
from the various parts of the world marked out the subject-matter of political
science which included 1) Political theory 2) Political Institutions 3)
Political Dynamiics and 4) International Relations.
As the
importance of political science is increasing day by day , its scope is also
increasing and becoming wider. Thus in general scope of political science
includes following things:
1) Study of State and Government:
Political
science is the science of state and government. It deals with the nature and formation
of the state and tries to understand various forms and functions of the
government. Scholars like Bluntschli, Garris and others believe that the scope
of political science is restricted to the study of the state alone. Scholars
like Leacock attach more importance to the study of government that to the
state.
Political
science makes a thorough investigation into the origin of the state. It also
deals with the elements of the state, sovereignty and law, ends and functions
of state, the rights and obligations of the individual, political institutions,
forms of government, elections, political parties, public opinion, local bodies
and international bodies etc. it studies state as it is, as it has been and as
it ought to be.
2) Study of Political Theory:
Political
theory is a major branch of political science. On the basis of the political
ideas or thoughts of political thinkers, political theory formulates
definitions of the concepts like democracy, liberty, equality, ground of
political obligation etc. It deals with some rudimentary concepts of political
science. Speculations of political philosophers and other ideologies are put
together in one volume which is given the title political theory.
3) Study of Political Institutions:
The study of
political institutions includes a study of constitutions and comparative
governments. It deals with the nature of different political institutions,
including government, explains their merits and demerits, their structure and
working and arrives at different conclusions on comparative basis. The study of
public administration and local governments may also be included under this
heading.
4) Study of Political Dynamics:
The study of
political dynamics has become important in the twentieth century. It means the
current forces at work in government and politics. It covers a wide range of
and includes political parties, public opinion, pressure groups, lobbies etc. A
scientific study of the working of these political dynamics helps us to explain
the political behavior of individuals and groups. The study in this field is
often done in collaboration with other social sciences like sociology,
anthropology and psychology etc. Human nature is not static but dynamic. Hence
the study of political dynamics becomes extremely essential to understand
changing concepts.
5) Study of adjustment of individual with the
state:
It is
interesting to study the nature of relationship between individual and state
and to examine how man adjusts within the society. Man is the root of politics.
The state guarantees certain rights and liberties to its citizens and also
imposes certain reasonable restrictions on them. Maximum state intervention can
lead to loss of liberty and complete absence of the state intervention can lead
to a state of anarchy (Chaos). It is a difficult problem to adjust and
reconcile the authority of the state with the individual liberty.
6) Study of international relations and
international law:
It includes
wide range of topics like diplomacy, international politics, international law
and organisations like UN. With
technological advancement and progress in human knowledge the world has come
closed and become like one family. Human society today is viewed from a world
perspective. Therefore the study of international relations today has become an
independent discipline.
7) Study of disagreements and their resolution:
Disagreement
is at the root of any political process on account of conflicting interests,
contradictory view and opinions, socio-economic inequalities and scarce
resource available to resolve these issues. Hence politics is all about making
choices and arriving at policy decisions suitable to the broad demands and
needs of people in the society. Elections are said to be the most effective
means of resolving conflicts in any society. Apart from it Legislature,
Judiciary, Pressure groups also are some other means to resolve political
conflicts at public level.
Thus political
science over period of time has covered wide range of subjects under its scope.
Beginning from traditional study based on state, government, law and
institutions to modern study focusing on process, political dynamics, political
socialization, political cultures, political development and informal
structures like pressure groups etc. It is not that traditional boundaries in
the study of political science have been obliterated they merely have been
extended to give sharpness and depth hitherto unknown.
Approaches to the study of Political Science
Introduction:
Political
Theory emerged out of the observation and the analysis of politics in different
places and situations. The need for laws, procedures and authority was felt
universally and they were created and applied with some degree of success,
consistencies were observed, alternatives were thought and theories emerged.
There was always a gap between theory and practice, desirable and the actual,
the ideal and the possible. Various approaches have emerged to the study of
political science such as:
1) Normative
Approach
2) Empirical-
Behavioural Approach
3) Feminist
Approach
4) Post-Behavioural
5) Plural and
Neo-Plural Approach
6) Marxist
Approach
7) Green
Approach etc.
Normative Approach:
The oldest
approach to the study of politics initiated by Greek philosophers like Plato
& Aristotle is known as the normative approach. The normative approach is
rooted in theory and oriented towards ideals and norms. The philosophers set
the standards through intuition and logical deduction. They tried to arrive at
the ideals that would establish the ‘good life’ which was seen as the goal of
political activity. Norms such as Liberty, Equality and Justice were seen as
essential conditions of good life and their dimensions and ways of realization
were prescribed by the philosophers. The study of politics became the study of
norms that will establish the best order of things in an organized community.
Hence this approach is known as the normative approach. It is also called as
the philosophical approach, Legal approach, Formal Approach, historical
approach and institutional approach.
Significant Features of Normative Approach:
1) Value-loaded Approach:
Normative
approach is ethically oriented; it deals with the good, the right and the just.
The ideals cannot but be formulated in ethical terms. It was loaded with values
of what is desirable and what is to be detested. Normative approach suggests
certain norms, values or ideals or the ethical dimension of politics which
ought to be realized. It aims to attain what is desirable or ideal. It is
loaded with some universal values like Liberty, Equality, Justice, Fraternity,
the right or the good. There for E H Carr considers this approach as Utopian
(Unreal).
2) Philosophical Deductive Method:
Traditional
political scientist adopted a philosophical deductive method for political
enquiry. It implies drawing conclusions from some general, universal
propositions which are supposed to be true. Thinkers like Plato and Aristotle
began their political enquiry with some self-evident, universal assumptions
from which they deduced certain conclusions. Their attempt is hence described
as ‘abstract theorising’, or ‘a priori thinking’ or ‘philosophizing rather than
practicing’.
3) Prescriptive Approach:
Normative
approach is also called as a prescriptive approach than a descriptive approach.
Normative study is an evaluative study
of principles and actions. Concepts and theories were formulated as the
parameters for evolving institutions and instruments of governing. It gives
less importance to description of the reality and more to prescription of
values and ideals.
Important
thinkers who contributed to the normative approach:
Plato in his classic work ‘republic’ talks
about an ideal state which is governed by a ‘Philosopher King’. According to
him a philosopher king is a person possessing unique and unparalleled virtues
who only can guarantee highest and best form of justice to the people.
Aristotle combined in him element of both a
philosopher and an empiricist. He made a comparative study of around 158
constitutions. He made value judgments on forms of government and laws. He
prescribed good and perverted forms of governments.
Apart from
these Greek philosophers some modern thinkers also have contributed to the fund
of normative thought. John Locke
propounded the theory of Natural Rights and government by consent as the
solution for tyranny of rulers. He developed the social contract theory where he
suggests that basis of any government has to be the consent and good of people.
The French
philosopher Rousseau conceived of
‘General Will’ as the ideal will as it ought to be, to which all individuals
must conform to realize their own freedom. He was attempting reconciliation
between individual liberty and state authority.
The German
idealist Hegel deified the state;
according to him state was ‘March of God on Earth’. He prescribed that
individual self is to be sacrificed for the better self: the state.
Criticism:
1) It ignores
to contemplate on ‘what is’ in its inclination to study ‘what ought’ to be.
2) It is a
value-laden approach which sometimes moves away from reality and turns out to
be utopia. It is based on some preferences, prejudices and personal judgments.
3) It is a
subjective area of study.
4) It lacks
inter-disciplinary approach.
Empirical Approach
Introduction:
Right down to
the end of the nineteenth century politics was largely, if not, exclusively
seen as a normative discipline mostly forming part of moral philosophy. The
beginning of empiricism began early in the 20th century. But until
the post-world war II period it was not an acknowledged approach to
intellectual enquiry in politics. The change from the normative to empirical
approach was a turn from ideals to facts, from value-loaded prescription to
value neutral description and from institutional to behavioral study.
Arthur F Bentley,
sociologist at the Chicago University published a book ‘The Process of
Government’ in 1908. He explained the group basis of all political behavior. In
the same year Graham Wallas published Human Nature in Politics, bringing out
the psychological dimensions of political actions.
New Aspects of
Politics (1925) by Charles Merriam (Intellectual God-father of Behavioural
Approach), the Science and Methods of Politics (1927) by George E Catlin,
Quantitative Methods in Politics (1928) by Stuart Rice and Psychology and
Politics (1930) by Harold Laswell were the most notable publications of this
era that gave rise to the empirical dimension in political studies.
Hallmarks of Empirical Approach:
1) Scientific and Empirical Tools:
In the
post-world war II period the newly emerged states copied democratic system form
their colonial masters which were later found to be inappropriate to suit in
their socio-economic and cultural milieu. The empiricists developed appropriate
tools for the purpose of political enquiry such as political culture, criteria
of modernization, and indicators for development and categories for analysis.
Therefore empirical scientist introduced scientific techniques such as observation,
quantification, measurements, calculations, surveys, hypothesis testing and use
of aggregate data into political studies and thus aimed to give operational
meaning to political concepts.
2) Value Free Approach:
Empirical
approach divorces itself from values and focuses on facts. It is a value
neutral and a scientific approach to study and frees politics from moral,
ethical and philosophical values of life.
3) Focus on Behavioural Aspect:
In place of
the legal institutional study hitherto followed, the emphasis in empirical
approach now was on political behavior. The focus is on man, not ideals.
Politics was concerned with now how man exercised authority, persuaded and
coerced, expressed his demands shared and compromised with his fellows.
Politics was more concerned with the motivations, prejudices, actions and
policies, with voting behavior, activism, apathy and indifference.
4) Inter-disciplinary approach:
Empirical
approach also clarified the link between politics and other disciplines.
Behavior in politics cannot be studied in isolation, because people behave in
particular ways because of attitudes and dispositions developed through group
life. Therefore empirical approach emphasized on the close link between
political science and other disciplines such as psychology, sociology,
anthropology and economics.
5) Emphasis on wide range of areas:
Thinkers like
David Easton developed system model (Input- Conversion- Output- Feedback) to
study political phenomenon. On the other hand Arthur Bentley and David Truman
focused on the significance of groups and their influence on the working of the
state. This led to the study of pressure groups as a separate topic in politics.
Empirical approach widened the scope of political studies by including Power
analysis, Decision Making Analysis and Role Analysis (Almond’s
Structural-functional Approach) into its stride. It also aimed at recommending
policy on the basis of the study made.
Criticism:
1) Empiricists
believe that an empirical science of politics based on facts alone is possible.
But the normative theorists believe that politics cannot be and should not be
purely scientific. It cannot be totally value-neutral. Because, a) values,
interests and curiosity of the investigator influence his choices of topics. b)
The prescientific knowledge not requiring any proofs has to be accepted. c) Biases
of the investigator cannot be easily kept out.
2) Empiricist has
no criteria for relevance. In striving for neutrality and objectivity they have
gone in for a new complicated ridiculous jargon. In an attempt to eschew values
they reject all ground for evaluation and treat all values as equal.
3) Study of
politics should have a purpose behind it. It should enable us to act rightly,
to choose the best, to make decisions about how best to live with fellowmen.
This aspect is completely ignored by the empirical approach.
Feminist
Approach
Introduction:
Feminism is a
social theory which advocates equal rights and social status of women. It is often used for the ‘Empowerment of
Women’, championing the cause of women’s rights and privileges and gender
equality. Feminists hold as stated by Catherine Mackinnon that “Women have been
unjustly unequal to men because of the social meaning of their bodies.”
Feminist thinkers ruthlessly criticize the established theories of state on the
grounds that they ignore the subjugation of women, and ignore gender
differences in structures of political power at all levels.
Feminism as a
political force became popular throughout the western world, especially in USA
and UK in the form of demand for political rights (Voting Rights) of women. It
was a struggle against unjustified supremacy of male over women in the human
society.
Feminist
activists campaign for women's rights – such as property, and voting rights, also
promoting bodily integrity, autonomy and reproductive rights for women.
Feminist campaigns have changed societies, particularly in the West, by
achieving women's suffrage, gender neutrality, equal pay for women,
reproductive rights for women (including access to contraceptives and
abortion), and the right to enter into contracts and own property. Feminists
have worked to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual
harassment, and sexual assault. They have also advocated for workplace rights,
including maternity leave, and against forms of discrimination against women. Feminism
is mainly focused on women's issues, but because feminism seeks gender
equality, some feminists argue that men's liberation is a necessary part of
feminism, and that men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles.
Various brands/types of Feminist Approach:
Liberal Approach:
This approach
is universally recognized as the most reasonable, fair, just and effective
approach. It is deeply rooted in the philosophy of liberalism that highlights
the capital significance of certain political values such as Liberty, Equality,
Fraternity, political rights of women in representative democracy and certain
fundamental rights of women. Liberal feminism is a form of feminism that argues
that equality for women can be achieved through legal means and social reform. Liberal
feminism leans towards an equality or sameness argument with men. Liberal
feminism conceives of politics in individualistic terms and looks to reform
present practices in society, rather than advocating for a wholesale
revolutionary change. Feminist writers associated with this tradition include
early feminist Mary Wollstonecraft and second-wave feminist Betty Friedan.
Liberal feminists are often seen among other types of feminists as conservative
and overwhelmingly white and middle class.
Marxist Approach:
This approach
understands gender oppression and atrocities of men over women in the context
of historically evolved socio-eco-political order
Socialist feminism
Socialist
feminism focuses upon both the public and private spheres of a woman's life. It
argues that liberation can only be achieved by working to end both the economic
and cultural sources of women's oppression. It broadens Marxist feminism’s
argument that capitalism is the source of all women’s oppression. It incorporates
radical feminism's theory of the role of gender and the patriarchy. Socialist
feminism confronts the common root of sexism, racism and classism: the
determination of a life of oppression or privilege based on accidents of birth
or circumstances. Socialist feminism is an inclusive way of creating social
change.
Cultural feminism:
Cultural
feminism believes that a female nature or female essence is essential to
society. It opines that there are fundamental personality and psychological
differences between men and women, and that women's differences are not only
unique, but superior. This theory of feminism takes note of the biological differences
between men and women - such as menstruation and childbirth and extrapolates
from this the idea of an inherent "women's culture." For example, the
belief that "women are kinder and gentler than men," prompts cultural
feminists call for an infusion of women's culture into the male-dominated
world, which would presumably result in less violence and fewer wars. Cultural feminism
seeks to improve the relationship between the sexes and often cultures at large
by celebrating women's special qualities, ways, and experiences, often believing
that the "woman's way" is the better way, or that the culture
discussed is overly masculine and requires balance from feminine perspectives.
Radical feminism:
Radical
feminism is a branch of feminism (1960’s and 70’s) that views women's
oppression (which radical feminists refer to as "patriarchy") as a
basic system of power upon which human relationships in society are arranged. It
seeks to challenge this arrangement by rejecting standard gender roles and male
oppression. The term radical in radical feminism (from Latin) is used as an
adjective meaning of or pertaining to the root or going to the root. Radical
feminists locate the root cause of women's oppression in patriarchal gender
relations, as opposed to legal systems (liberal feminism) or class conflict
(like socialist or Marxist feminism).
Eco-feminism:
Ecofeminism is
a social and political movement which unites environmentalism and feminism. Eco-feminists
argue that a relationship exists between the oppression of women and the degradation
of nature. Eco-feminists are concerned
with connections between sexism and the domination of nature. They are also
concerned with racism and other characteristics of social inequality. Some
current work emphasizes that the capitalist and patriarchal system is based on
triple domination of the "Southern people" (those people who live in
the Third World, the majority of which are south of the First World), women,
and nature. This is sometimes referred to as global north and south.
Three waves of Feminism:
First-wave
feminism was a period of activity during the nineteenth century
and early twentieth century. In the UK and US, it focused on the promotion of
equal contract, marriage, parenting, and property rights for women. By the end
of the nineteenth century, activism focused primarily on gaining political
power, particularly the right of women's suffrage, though some feminists were
active in campaigning for women's sexual, reproductive, and economic rights as
well.
Women's suffrage was achieved in Britain's Australasian
colonies at the close of the 19th century, with the self-governing colonies of New
Zealand and South Australia granting women the right to vote in 1893 and 1895
respectively. It was followed by Australia permitting women to stand for
parliamentary office and granting women the right to vote.
In Britain the Suffragettes and the Suffragists
campaigned for the women's vote, and in 1918 the Representation of the People
Act was passed granting the right to vote to women over the age of 30 who owned
houses. In 1928 this was extended to all women over twenty-one. In the U.S.,
notable leaders of this movement included Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton,
and Susan B. Anthony, who each campaigned for the abolition of slavery prior to
championing women's right to vote. These women were influenced by the Quaker
theology of spiritual equality, which asserts that men and women are equal
under God. In the United States, first-wave feminism is considered to have
ended with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution (1919), granting women the right to vote in all states.
Second
wave feminism is largely concerned with issues of equality other than
suffrage, such as ending discrimination. Second-wave feminists see women's
cultural and political inequalities as inextricably linked and encourage women
to understand aspects of their personal lives as deeply politicized and as
reflecting sexist power structures. The feminist activist and author Carol
Hanisch coined the slogan "The Personal is Political", which became
synonymous with the second wave.
In the early 1990s in the USA, third-wave
feminism began as a response to perceived failures of the second wave and
to the backlash against initiatives and movements created by the second wave.
Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave's
essentialist definitions of femininity, which, they argue, over-emphasize the
experiences of upper middle-class white women. Third-wave feminists often focus
on "micro-politics" and challenge the second wave's paradigm as to
what is, or is not, good for women, and tend to use a post-structuralist
interpretation of gender and sexuality.
The term post-feminism is used
to describe a range of viewpoints reacting to feminism since the 1980s. While
not being "anti-feminist", post-feminists believe that women have
achieved second wave goals while being critical of third wave feminist goals.
The term was first used to describe a backlash against second-wave feminism,
but it is now a label for a wide range of theories that take critical
approaches to previous feminist discourses and includes challenges to the
second wave's ideas. Other post-feminists say that feminism is no longer
relevant to today's society. Amelia Jones has written that the post-feminist
texts which emerged in the 1980s and 1990s portrayed second-wave feminism as a
monolithic entity.
References:
1) Political
theory by V D Mahajan
2) An
introduction to Political Theory by O P Gauba
3) Political
Ideas and Concepts by Andrew Heywood
4) Principles
of Modern Political Science by J C Johari
